Seminar 4 Alignment & affiliation


Maintaining progressivity in the interaction…


“could have made things awkward and difficult for the conversation to continue”

Where is the other-initiated repair done in the Louis Theroux interview?




Alignment and affiliation

How do we know what goes next in conversation? Conditional relevance (Alignment)​

​How can speakers know the hearer is on side? (Affiliation)​

​How does our understanding of alignment and affiliation provide insights for professional practice?  

 

Activity: What does Tony think of the new logo?

 

Affiliation

Alignment

Align with the project of the talk.

Align with the project of the talk.

Affiliate with the speaker.

Affiliate with the speaker.

 

Activity

Come up with a list of actions that hearers display to the speaker.

In other words, how do you do listening? Add your ideas here.


 

Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31-57.

Thus, the concepts of structural alignment and social affiliation are separate interactional issues and are managed by different response tokens.
— (Stivers, 2008, p. 31)

Screen Shot 2021-07-31 at 3.25.46 pm.png
Backchanels three languages.png
Reactive expressions in three languages.png

Steensig, J. (2020). Conversation analysis and affiliation and alignment. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics. London: Wiley. (p.4)

Stivers & Mondada (2011) Table 1.png
unsplash-image-dqpEg5lo9P0.jpg
 
 

Activity: So what's the difference between alignment and affiliation?

In this topic, we have seen that alignment and affiliation are managed through the sequential organisation of talk, the management of repair, and preference organisation. Essentially, we are starting to see how the building blocks of the content in the subject so far equip us with the tools to investigate how people use language to achieve specific social action. 

Let's use the example of 'telling jokes' as social action, to consider what is necessary for alignment and what constitutes affiliation.

The questions for you to resolve are:

  • What is the conditionally relevant next action to a question-answer designed joke?

  • Can you find an example of where the joke recipient does alignment and affiliation?

  • Can you find an example where the joke recipient does alignment and disaffiliation?

  • Can you find an example where the joke recipient does affiliation but not alignment?

  • Can you find an example of disaffiliation and disalignment?

Watch the clip below for as many times as you need to to be able to answer the questions! 

 
 

Activity

The following story is the basis of Stivers' analysis of alignment and affiliation (from this topic reading).

Identify: What demonstrates alignment with the story? What demonstrates affiliation with the stance of the storyteller?

Stivers (2008) The god got out 1.png
Stivers (2008) the dog got out 2.png
 

Summary

Preference for alignment (interactionally). But we are wary of attributing status to actions...​ (e.g. is laughter always affiliative?)

Multiple resources speakers and listeners draw on to demonstrate alignment and/or affiliation.

Attuned responses are the key to productive (professional) interaction.

Amelia Church

Continuing professional development in effective communication.

http://www.talkseminars.com
Previous
Previous

Seminar 3 Repair

Next
Next

Seminar 5 Education